Learning outcomes |
At the end of the curricular unit, the student must be able to understand and explain image as sign and part of the semiotic process; circumscribe and define the universe of visual arts; reflect critically about the impact of technology in visual arts, identifying concrete consequences of that impact in the representation of reality and in the assembly of meanings through images; and analyze and deconstruct the role performed by images in the construction of a cultural identity. It is also our purpose that each student is able to demonstrate competence to work both individually and in group, understanding the previously defined parameters for each evaluation moment, as well as concern with the quality of the presented results, orally and in writing, and with the fulfillment of the established goals.
|
Main Bibliography |
ARNHEIM, R. (2001). O poder do centro. Um estudo da composição nas artes visuais, Lisboa: Ed. 70. BARTHES, R. (1984). O óbvio e o obtuso, Lisboa: Ed. 70. BOZAL, V. (1987). Mímesis: las Imágenes y las Cosas, Madrid: Visor. CATALÀ, J. (2006). La imagen compleja. La fenomenología de las imágenes en la era de la cultura visual, Barcelona: Univ. Autònoma de Barcelona. ECO, U. (1990). O Signo, Lisboa: Ed. Presença. GAUTHIER, G. (1996). Veinte Lecciones sobre la Imagen y el Sentido, Madrid: Cátedra. GROUPE MU (1993). Tratado del Signo Visual, Madrid: Cátedra. JOLY, M. (2005). A imagem e os signos, Lisboa: Ed. 70. NIEMEYER, L. (2007). Elementos de semiótica aplicados ao Design, 2ª Edição, Rio de Janeiro: 2AB. NOBLE, I. & RUSSELL, B. (2005). Visual Research. An introduction to research methodologies in graphic design, Lausanne: AVA Publishing. MARGOLIN, V. (2014). Design e risco de mudança, Matosinhos: ESAD. T. VILAR, E. (Coord.), (2014). Design et al. Dez perspectivas contemporâneas, D.Quixote
|