Main Bibliography |
Almaraz, I., Ética de la Imagen, 2ª ed., Madrid, Laberinto, 2002. Camps, V (org.) (1999). História de la ética, vols. 1 e 2. Madrid: Crítica. _____________ (2000). História de la ética, vol 3. Madrid: Crítica. Faustino, P. (org.), Ética e Responsabilidade Social dos Media, Porto, Formalpress, col. Media XXI, 2007. Freire, M. (2007), Relação, encontro e reciprocidade: algumas reflexões sobre a ética no cinema documentário contemporâneo, In Revista Galáxia (1328) nº14. Jones, W. & Vice, S. (eds.) (2011). Ethics at the cinema. New York: Oxford University Press. Santos, J. M. (2012). Introdução à Ética. Lisboa: Documenta. Santos, A. L. M. (2014). No princípio era o êthos. Elementos para uma análise da transversalidade ética no cinema, In A. C. Valente & R. Capucho (coord.). AVANCA | CINEMA 2014 (10901095). Avanca: Edições CineClube de Avanca. Singer, P. (ed.) (1993). A companion to ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
|
Teaching Methodologies and Assessment Criteria |
The methodology adopted takes into account both the essentially reflective nature of ethics and the importance of conceptual rigor and of going beyond the merely opinionated. In this way, it is considered important to the transmission of content, which aims to provide the student with fundamental conceptual and theoretical tools, to promote debate on film analysis and on the role of cinema and filmmakers in ethical education. The assessment elements will be: a. A group assignment (written and oral presentation): analysis of a film in class (50%) b. An individual assignment (40%) c. Class participation and attendance (10%) Attendance of at least 75% in class (the syllabus has been designed with the students' actual presence in mind), punctuality, as well as the overall behavior of the students (aspects such as the interest shown, the relevance or objectivity of the interventions). Minimum mark to be admitted to the exam: 6 (six) Any evidence of plagiarism will be penalized with 0.
|