|
Main Bibliography |
1. Principal - Dixon, T. A., Williams, T. C., & Pretorius, I. S. (2022). Bioinformational trends in grape and wine biotechnology. Trends in Biotechnology, 40(1), 124-135. Winter, J. (2000). Environmental Processes I: Wastewater Treatment In: Biotechnology, volume 11a, 2nd Edition, , WILEY-VCH.; D. Gomes, A. Sousa, L.A. Passarinha. “Tyrosinase Immobilization in Nickel-Cross-Linked Gellan Microspheres and Conversion of l-DOPA to Dopachrome”. Journal of Chemical Education 98 (2021). M. Prescott, J.P. Harley, D.A. Klein, Microbiology, McGrawHill, 11ª edição (2019).in ndustrial Microbiology and Biotechnology ;Mouro, C., & Gouveia, I. C. (2023). Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 1–19; V. Evtuguin (2014) “Biotechnology Applications in the Pulp and Paper Industry”, em Shishir Sinha and J.N. Govil (eds.), BIOTECHNOLOGY, Vol. 12. Bioprocess Engineering, Chapter 22,Publisher Studium Press LLC, Houston, TX, USA.
2. Bibliografia complementar: Aulas: http://moodle.ubi.pt/
|
|
Teaching Methodologies and Assessment Criteria |
Continuous assessment - The final classification of the teaching-learning period (CEA) is calculated according to the following expression: CEA = 70% theoretical component + 30% practical component. Weighting of the practical part: sum of all the work to be carried out in this UC, and the student must obtain a minimum average classification of 9.50 in the work of the different components: (A1 + B1 + B2 +A2 + B3 + B4)/ 6 with A1 and A2 being components of Microbiology applied to industrial processes and Food Biotechnology and B1, B2, B3 and B4 being the remaining components according to the program. Weighting of the theoretical component: (1*14% of item A1 + 2*18% of item B1,2) +(1*14% of item A2 + 2*18% of item B3,4)
|