|
Syllabus |
The Project I-2 course is developed throughout the semester through exercises of progressive complexity. It begins with an exercise focused on the analysis of architectural works, based on references of spaces for dwelling/refuge and their graphic representation. This work is carried out in groups of 3 to 4 students. This is followed by Exercise 1, dedicated to the study, analysis, and development of concepts related to housing as a space of refuge, explored through different methodological strategies, such as graphic representation, conceptual analysis, and a final propositional phase. This exercise is developed individually. The semester concludes with Exercise 2, which consists of the development of a small-scale architectural facility of simple complexity, articulated with Exercise 1, while addressing the characterization of the surrounding space shared by both volumes.
|
|
Main Bibliography |
BAEZA, Alberto Campo, A Ideia Construída, Caleidoscópio, Casal Cambra, 2011.BAEZA, Alberto Campo, Pensar com as Mãos, Caleidoscópio, Casal Cambra, 2011.CARERI, F. (2005). El andar como práctica estética. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili. CHING, Francis D. K., Arquitectura: Forma, Espacio y Orden, Gustavo Gili, Barcelona, 1995. MADERUELO, J. (ed.) (2001). Arte público, naturaleza y ciudad. Lanzarote: César Manrique. NORBERG-SCHULZ, Christian, “A Paisagem e a Obra do Homem”, in Arquitectura, no102, p.52. NUFRIO, A. (2008) (org.). Eduardo Souto de Moura. Conversas com estudantes. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili. PALLASMAA, Juhani, Habitar, Gustavo Gili, Barcelona, 2016. PALLASMAA, Juhani, Los Ojos de la Piel, Gustavo Gili, Barcelona, 2006. SILVA, J. A. da (1996). História da Covilhã. Covilhã: José Aires da Silva. TAÍNHA, M. (1994). Arquitectura em questão. Lisboa: AE/FAUTL. ZEVI, Bruno, Saber ver a Arquitectura, Arcádia, Lisboa, 1977. ZUMTHOR, Peter, Atmosferas. Barcelona, Gustavo Gili, Barcelona, 2006.
|
|
Teaching Methodologies and Assessment Criteria |
Assessment is continuous, integrating qualitative evaluations at the end of each intermediate phase and quantitative assessments at the final submissions, always preceded by critical discussion of the work. At the end of the semester, a global evaluation of the work developed is carried out, with the final grade assessed equitably across the cohort. Assessment considers attendance, participation, regularity and continuity of work, quality of proposals and achievement of the course objectives. Minimum compulsory attendance is 75%. The course does not include a final examination, and approval is obtained exclusively through the theoretical-practical component. Improvement of one exercise is possible, provided that all exercises have been submitted and a minimum grade of 7 (out of 20) has been achieved. 20% (group work) · 40% (Exercise 1) · 40% (Exercise 2)
|