| Code |
15569
|
| Year |
2
|
| Semester |
S2
|
| ECTS Credits |
6
|
| Workload |
OT(15H)/TP(45H)
|
| Scientific area |
Philosophy
|
|
Entry requirements |
.-
|
|
Learning outcomes |
The general objectives of the discipline are: to understand aesthetics through the epistemological specificity of its object and its critical implications; raising of questions and concepts and exploring the main conceptions of the history of aesthetics.
At the end, the student should have acquired:
- knowledge in the field of aesthetic information, what it is, what its field of application is, what its operating mechanism is, in order to formulate a clear and concise characterization of philosophical aesthetics;
- skills in preparing written and oral exercises to comment on and summarize the fundamental aspects of texts by authors presented for study;
- skills that aim to determine the reference that aesthetic theories constitute for the aesthetic analysis of the value of the work of art, so that from this analysis it is possible to open up to new aesthetic perspectives.
|
|
Syllabus |
Introduction. Notion of Aesthetics.
1. Aesthetics in the emergence of a problematic of synthesis.
2. Science of beauty x science of sensitive knowledge.
3. Aesthetic domain of formativity. Poetic model (téchnê).
4. Formal purpose of aesthetics. The aesthetic judgment.
5. Aesthetics as an installation of the world.
6. Aesthetics in the context of the experience of the work. Appeal to the world of life.
Conclusion. Examination of the state of aesthetics “after” the sublime.
|
|
Main Bibliography |
Benjamin, W. (2006). A Modernidade. Assírio e Alvim.
Blanché, R. (1979). Des catégories esthétiques. Vrin.
Cassirer, E. (1994). A filosofia do iluminismo. Unicamp.
Costa, C. C., S. (2001).Tópica estética: filosofia, música, pintura. IN-CM.
Dufrenne, M. (1953). Phénoménologie de l’expérience esthétique. PUF.
Gaut, B. and Lopes, D. M. (2001). The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. https://monoskop.org/images/0/03/Lopes_Dominic_Gaut_Berys_The_Routledge_Companiom_2001.pdf
Heidegger, M. (1983). A proveniência da Arte e a determinação do Pensar (pp. pp. 135-149). Vittorio Klostermann.
Hume, D. (2002). Ensaios Morais, Políticos e literários. IN-CM.
Kant (1992). Crítica da faculdade do juízo [Kritik der Urteilskraft, 1790]. Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda.
Llano, A. (1989). La nueva sensibilidad. Espasa-Calpe.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1988). L’Inhumain, causeries sur le temps. Éditions Galilée.Benjamin, W. (2006). A Modernidade. Assírio e Alvim.
|
|
Teaching Methodologies and Assessment Criteria |
Teaching methodologies combine theoretical sessions with practical sessions. The sessions follow a repertoire of forms participated by the teacher and students that bring together the objective description of the working documents, explanation and subjective discussion notes, articulated with tutoring for reading especially the selected texts.
The assessment involves writing a critical text that will be presented orally in class. Furthermore, during the semester, the student must read a work from the program in full and provide, in the context of a written assessment, a global understanding of the topic covered in it.
|
|
Language |
Portuguese. Tutorial support is available in English.
|