|
Teaching Methodologies and Assessment Criteria |
The final classification of each student will result from the weighting of the following elements:
1. 1 Written Test of Frequency (final); 2. Oral and written presentation of a text on the object of the design, freely chosen, on a theme of the program - the oral presentation will take place in the context of a classroom and the written text is prepared in groups (of 4 students) and must not exceed the 2 pages;
Weighting: 1. 60%; 2. 40% (20% for the oral part and 20% for the written part)
2. The minimum teaching-learning classification is six (6) values.
3. The course has mandatory attendance of 75% of the total number of expected teaching hours.
4. In order to know the rules of academic integrity underlying the assessment activities, it is recommended to read the Code of Integrity of the University of Beira Interior.
|
|
Main Bibliography |
BENJAMIN, W., “A obra de arte na era da sua reprodutibilidade técnica”, in Sobre arte, técnica, linguagem e política, Lisboa, Relógio D’Água, 1992.
BERGER, J. (2018). Modos de ver, Lisboa, Antígona.
DEWEY, J. (1934, 2005), Art as experience, Ed. Perigee.
EAGLETON, T. (2005). The Function of Criticism, London, Verso Books.
GAUT, Berys & LOPES, Dominic McIver. The Routledge companion to aesthetics, London, Routledge, 2005.
HAUSKEN, LIV, Thinking media aesthetics: Media Studies, Film Studies and the arts, Berlin: Peter Lang, 2013.
HEIDEGGER, M., Origem da obra de arte, Lisboa, Ed.70, 1991.
KANT, Crítica da faculdade do juízo [Kritik der Urteilskraft, 1790], Lisboa, Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda, 1992.
MANOVITCH, Lev, Post-Media Aesthetics (2001), https://manovich.net/index.php/projects/post-media-aesthetics.
MARCHIORI, Dario (2013), “Media Aesthetics”, in Preserving and exhibiting Media Art, Amsterdam University Press, 81 – 99.
|